Nunes, Boulos e Marçal empatam em São Paulo, diz Quaest
8 Articles
8 Articles
Tabata Amaral went from 8% to 10% of voting intentions in one week
The institute interviewed 1,800 voters between Friday the 27th and Sunday the 29th
The candidates Ricardo Nunes (MDB), Guilherme Boulos (PSOL) and Pablo Marçal (PRTB) are technically tied in the race for the São Paulo City Hall, according to a survey released this Tuesday (01) by the Paraná Research Institute. Nunes has 27.0%; Boulos, 25.0%; and Marçal appears with 22.5% of the voting intentions. The margin of error is 2.6 percentage points higher or lower. 1,500 voters from the city of São Paulo were interviewed by Paraná Pes…
Nunes, Boulos e Marçal: Quaest em SP mantém empate triplo
Pesquisa Quaest divulgada nesta segunda-feira (30) mostra Ricardo Nunes (MDB) com 24%, Guilherme Boulos (PSOL) com 23% e Pablo Marçal (PRTB) com 21% na corrida pela Prefeitura de São Paulo. Eles seguem em empate técnico triplo na liderança da disputa paulistana. Em comparação com a pesquisa de 24 de setembro, Nunes oscilou negativamente um ponto percentual, de 25% para 24%, Boulos manteve os 23%, e Marçal oscilou positivamente um ponto, de 20% p…
Mayor Ricardo Nunes (MDB; photo), federal congressman Guilherme Boulos (PSOL), and former coach Pablo Marçal (PRTB; photo) are still in a technical tie in the election to the São Paulo City Hall, less than a week before the election, according to a Quaest survey released on Monday evening, September 30. The study points out Nunes with 24% of... The post Quaest: Nunes, Boulos, and Marçal are still in a technical tie appeared first on The Antagoni…
Nunes, Boulos e Marçal empatam em São Paulo, diz Quaest
Levantamento Quaest encomendado pela TV Globo e divulgado nesta 2ª feira (30.set.2024) mostra empate triplo na corrida pela Prefeitura de São Paulo. O prefeito Ricardo Nunes (MDB) aparece, numericamente, à frente com 24% das intenções de voto. É seguido pelo deputado federal Guilherme Boulos (Psol), 23%, e pelo ex-coach e empresário Pablo Marçal (PRTB), que tem 21%. A margem de erro é de 2 pontos percentuais.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium





