US EditionPinkertons Redux: Anti-Labor New York Court Attempts to Cut Off Litigation by SoundExchange Against Sirius/Pandora
In SoundExchange v. SiriusXM, the court’s opinion reads less like a neutral application of law and more like a result-oriented exercise in narrowing artist rights to hand Sirius a Pyrrhic victory. To get there, the judge had to look everywhere but the statute — twisting Congress’s words, importing unrelated legal doctrines, and ignoring the historical context of 17 USC §114 (the section of the Copyright Act that covers SoundExchange). Remember, …
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
Pinkertons Redux: Anti-Labor New York Court Attempts to Cut Off Litigation by SoundExchange Against Sirius/Pandora
In SoundExchange v. SiriusXM, the court’s opinion reads less like a neutral application of law and more like a result-oriented exercise in narrowing artist rights to hand Sirius a Pyrrhic victory. To get there, the judge had to look everywhere but the statute — twisting Congress’s words, importing unrelated legal doctrines, and ignoring the historical context of 17 USC §114 (the section of the Copyright Act that covers SoundExchange). Remember, …
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
