Without Saying His Name, Packers GM Brian Gutekunst Addresses Micah Parsons Trade Rumors
Micah Parsons requested a trade amid contract disputes with the Cowboys; Packers GM Brian Gutekunst considers a deal to bolster their pass rush before the 2025 season.
- At 10:55 p.m. ET on August 27, 2025, John Kuhn, former Green Bay Packers fullback and Packers TV Network sideline analyst, tweeted `Micah Freaking Parsons`, sparking heavy fan speculation without additional context.
- Earlier this month, Micah Parsons requested a trade after seeking a top-tier extension and owner Jerry Jones negotiated without Parsons' agent, escalating tensions.
- Several insiders have named the Green Bay Packers as a contender, noting their need for pass-rushing help, available draft capital, and GM Brian Gutekunst's readiness to make bold moves in the coming years.
- Overnight, rumors swelled even as Dallas maintained it is not negotiating; Brian Schottenheimer confirmed a private, productive hour-long conversation with Micah Parsons but no practice assurance.
- A trade for Micah Parsons would likely require multiple first-round picks and possibly a high-level skill player, but Green Bay Packers could realistically assemble such a package in the coming years to strengthen their Super Bowl chances.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
13 Articles
13 Articles
Packers GM Brian Gutekunst Tiptoes Around Micah Parsons Trade Question
“Any opportunity to help your football team you have to look at and discuss as a group,” said Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst on Wednesday. “We do that all the time. I mean, it’s almost daily.”Of course, Gutekunst wasn’t talking in generalizations. He was referring to Dallas Cowboys star edge rusher Micah Parsons, whose contract dispute with the organization has been dominating headlines for months. Green Bay is rumored to be i…
·New York, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources13
Leaning Left2Leaning Right1Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution57% Center
Bias Distribution
- 57% of the sources are Center
57% Center
L 29%
C 57%
14%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium