Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Oregon abortion coverage law ruled unconstitutional

The ruling is limited for now, and state officials say coverage remains unchanged while they prepare an appeal.

  • On Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai ruled the Oregon Reproductive Health Equity Act is unconstitutional as applied to Oregon Right to Life, the nonprofit that challenged the state's abortion coverage mandate.
  • ORTL filed the lawsuit in 2023, arguing the state's mandate to include abortion coverage in employee health plans violates the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause by forcing the organization to fund practices contradicting its pro-life mission.
  • The ruling relied on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission, which struck down a similar scheme for lacking religious neutrality when granting employer exemptions.
  • Governor Tina Kotek and Attorney General Dan Rayfield announced plans to appeal the decision, emphasizing that the law remains in effect and coverage requirements are currently unchanged pending a written opinion.
  • Rayfield noted the ruling addresses a specific religious exemption claim by one organization, though Planned Parenthood Action Oregon expressed concern that removing coverage creates barriers for patients seeking essential reproductive health care.
Insights by Ground AI

13 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 75% of the sources are Center
75% Center

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

The Register-Guard broke the news in Eugene, United States on Tuesday, April 14, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal