US EditionOntario Court of Appeal Decides to Allow Expanded Arguments in Hamilton Encampment Case
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has ruled that it will allow lawyers appealing Justice James Ramsey’s decision to not permit encampments to argue the Justice erred in not admitting some affidavit evidence and statistical data when deciding on Hamilton’s bylaws prohibiting encampments. Lawyers representing the homeless individuals plan to argue that Justice Ramsey made numerous errors of law in his decision. The appeal application groups these er…
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
Ontario Court of Appeal Decides to Allow Expanded Arguments in Hamilton Encampment Case
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has ruled that it will allow lawyers appealing Justice James Ramsey’s decision to not permit encampments to argue the Justice erred in not admitting some affidavit evidence and statistical data when deciding on Hamilton’s bylaws prohibiting encampments. Lawyers representing the homeless individuals plan to argue that Justice Ramsey made numerous errors of law in his decision. The appeal application groups these er…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
