Observers Highlight the Dangers of Assumption-Based Justice in the Febrie Adriansyah Case
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.4 Articles
4 Articles
The Attorney General's Office is deemed necessary to present authentic evidence in the form of banking documents and digital footprints to prove the alleged corruption and money laundering crimes committed by former Jampidsus Febrie Adriansyah.
JAKARTA, Minews – The dynamics of law enforcement that ensnared the former Attorney General's Office's Special Crimes Director, Febrie Adriansyah, through charges of Money Laundering (TPPU) involving several third parties (proxies) and the establishment of a law firm, have become a major focus for law and governance observers. Public Policy observer Yanuar Wijanarko stated that credible law enforcement must be based on the principle […] Read the…
JPNN.com - JAKARTA - Public policy observer Yanuar Wijanarko reminded law enforcement officials not to build the alleged money laundering (TPPU) case that ensnared the former Attorney General's Office's Special Crimes Director, Febrie Adriansyah, only based on the assumption of a connection between the defendant and other parties.
Yanuar Wijanarko said that credible law enforcement must be based on the principle of strict due process of law and avoid the trap of assuming power relations.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
