New York Times executive fatally shot by his in-laws in Bay Area park, police say
Police said the couple was arrested within minutes after witnesses pointed officers to them, and detectives are still investigating the motive.
- On Saturday, September 26, 40-year-old Jonathan McKinsey was fatally shot at the Dublin Sports Grounds, with his parents-in-law Shouyong Zhang and Shili Chen arrested nearby on suspicion of murder.
- Court records show prosecutors charged McKinsey with two counts of misdemeanor child abuse last year; a probable cause declaration alleges he struck his six-year-old son in the face.
- Witnesses reported the couple took turns shooting McKinsey in the crowded parking lot; "This place is busy on a Saturday," said local resident Kevin Stein of Dublin.
- Held without bail, Zhang and Chen remain in custody at the Santa Rita Jail on suspicion of murder and are scheduled for arraignment on Wednesday morning.
- Dublin Police Services Capt. Miguel Campos confirmed no outstanding suspects exist, while detectives continue examining evidence to determine the circumstances that led to the homicide.
270 Articles
270 Articles
Brutal Crime of a New York Times Executive: a Conflict Divorce, Cross-Reporting and Detained in-Laws
Jonathan McKinsey, 40, was found shot dead in a parking lot and his wife's parents were in the area.
A transgender father pleaded for more time with his children. Days before a custody hearing, he was killed
Before a transgender New York Times games engineer was fatally shot, he was engaged in a bitter custody battle with his estranged wife, court records show. His in-laws have been taken into custody.Police in Dublin, California, arrested Shouyong Zhang and Shili Chen on suspicion of murder and conspiracy to commit a crime following the Saturday death of Jonathan McKinsey, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Witnesses told CBS News that the c…
TVA Nouvelles
Le Journal de MontrealA leader of the New York Times was reportedly shot dead by his parents-in-law in California.
The victim had a restraining order for an ongoing divorce, a child custody dispute, and child abuse charges.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 49% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
