Money Route K: The Supreme Court Upheld the Convictions of Lázaro Baez and Others Involved in the Case

Rosatti, Lorezentti and two judges rejected the appeals filed by the Kirchnerist businessman; Rosenkrantz did not accompany the majority because he felt that the prosecutor should rule

The highest court held that businessman K was guilty.They had to call two judges to define.

He did so by rejecting the appeals filed by all those convicted. The decision is the prelude to what the court can decide in the “Viality” case, in which former President Cristina Kirchner is condemned. Judge Carlos Rosenkrantz voted in dissent

It is not clear how long Lázaro Baez should go to prison because he served pretrial detention.

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation upheld the sentences handed down in the case known as the “K Money Route”, by rejecting the appeals filed by the defendants on the grounds that they are inadmissible. The decision of the highest court implies that the sentences imposed by the Federal Oral Court 4, in one of the emblematic cases on money laundering linked to corruption in Argentina, can no longer be appealed and remain final. Among the m…

The Supreme Court of Justice upheld the convictions for money laundering in the case known as the "money route K" which had as its main defendant the businessman Lázaro Báez. The case began in 2013 after a journalistic report of the PPT program, led by Jorge Lanata, which revealed the testimonies of the "repentant" Leonardo Fariña and Federico Elaskar, in addition to the films of the financial SGI known as "La Rosadita" that operated in Puerto M…