Meat industry-backed PR campaign fueled backlash against plant-forward diet study
- A PR campaign by the firm Red Flag aimed to discredit the EAT-Lancet report, which recommended a 50% reduction in global red meat consumption, according to documents reviewed by DeSmog.
- The campaign was backed by the Animal Agriculture Alliance and utilized social media to portray scientific findings as elitist and radical.
- Even though the EAT-Lancet report is based on peer-reviewed research linking food systems to climate change, it faced significant backlash from meat and agribusiness interests.
- Opponents of the report framed the dietary guidance as a threat to personal freedom while discrediting scientists.
3 Articles
3 Articles


Meat industry-backed PR campaign fueled backlash against plant-forward diet study
A public relations firm working with the meat and dairy industry orchestrated an aggressive media campaign to discredit the landmark 2019 EAT-Lancet report, documents reviewed by DeSmog reveal.Clare Carlile reports for DeSmog.In short:The EAT-Lancet report, launched in 2019, urged a 50% cut in global red meat consumption to protect climate and health, but was quickly met with an orchestrated backlash.A confidential document reviewed by DeSmog sh…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage