US Supreme Court weighs law on suing Palestinian authorities over attacks
- The Supreme Court supported Douglas Horn, allowing him to sue Medical Marijuana Inc. Under RICO for lost wages due to a hemp-based supplement he claims contained THC.
- The Court is also considering cases allowing Americans to sue Palestinian authorities for damages related to attacks in Israel and the occupied West Bank.
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that Congress and the president are responsible for fairness judgments in national security and foreign policy.
- Mitchell Berger argued that assigning jurisdiction to Palestinian authorities violates their rights and compared it to the historical context of piracy law.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
24 Articles
24 Articles
All
Left
4
Center
9
Right
6
Supreme Court appears undecided on PLO lawsuit
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization, a case that aims to determine —after decades of litigation and legislation — whether American victims of Palestinian terrorism can sue the PLO and Palestinian Authority for their payments to terrorists and their families. The justices extensively questioned lawyers for the families of terror victims, the U.S. government and the PLO, giving few hints a…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources24
Leaning Left4Leaning Right6Center9Last UpdatedBias Distribution47% Center
Bias Distribution
- 47% of the sources are Center
47% Center
L 21%
C 47%
R 32%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage