US EditionLessons for Deference From the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Summary by The Regulatory Review
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
Lessons for Deference From the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corp. is ostensibly about the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the 1990s-era law that—also ostensibly—makes robocalls and junk faxes illegal. But the opinion’s real importance is to reinforce last year’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. That decision formally overruled Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, and with it the era of d…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
