US EditionBroadcasting Contribution: Judges Make the Following Judgment on the Örr
12 Articles
12 Articles
A woman does not want to pay a broadcasting fee because she does not consider the public service programme to be diverse enough. Although her complaint was not granted before the Leipzig Federal Administrative Court, her lawyers nevertheless consider the principle judgment to be a victory.
Is it too one-sided? If so, then the broadcasting contribution is unconstitutional.
The Federal Administrative Court has passed a ruling on public broadcasting setting new standards: courts can now examine the range of programmes offered. A woman from Bavaria had sued against the broadcasting fee.
A woman from Bavaria had complained that the programme was not balanced enough for her. The Federal Administrative Court is now rejecting the ruling of the first instance. Now it is necessary to renegotiate.
A radio broadcaster from Bavaria has achieved partial success in court with a signal effect for ÖRR critics: the Federal Administrative Court has overturned the previous ruling from Bavaria. The program of the Bayerischer Rundfunk is now to be examined for a balance. Years of criticism of public broadcasting – often referred to as "Staatsfunk" – has found a first legal response: A contributor from Bavaria had sued the Federal Administrative Cour…
Is the offer of public service broadcasting constitutional? This question must be new according to the ruling of the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig from Wednesday ... The post This verdict puts the entire broadcasting contribution to the test appeared first on Apollo News.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 83% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
