Tsoukalas: Article 23 Withdrawn, Political Responsibility Remains
8 Articles
8 Articles
ELAS demands answers from the government regarding the controversial Article 23 that was withdrawn after the reactions, describing the reduction of VAT to 13% for menstrual products as a "communication measure" The post Karpouchtsis: The government should explain to us how Article 23 was included in the bill appeared first on in.gr.
The fierce political confrontation between the government and the opposition over the bill concerning borrowers continues. New Democracy demands explanations for the vote against the provisions that, as it claims, protect debtors. PASOK responds that, despite the withdrawal of the controversial article that it denounces as serving the funds, a corresponding regulation still exists in the extrajudicial mechanism.
The party's press spokesman, Costas Tsoukalas, is demanding explanations from Kyriakos Pierrakakis and the Prime Minister regarding the provision that would allow for faster enforcement against borrowers, without a prior court decision. Read here ⇛
In an article in “Karfi”, Costas Tsoukalas criticizes the government for not setting rules for the funds and instead passing additional facilities in their favor through the back door. “This is exactly what the article 23 case highlighted. Under the title of protecting debtors, a serious change was attempted to their detriment: the private settlement agreement […]
Business Daily
Kostas Tsoukalas criticizes the government for favorable regulations in favor of funds, noting that the article 23 case revealed serious consequences for borrowers. PASOK reacted and led to the withdrawal of the article.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
