US EditionWhat the Supreme Court’s Parental Opt-Out Ruling Means for Schools
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, JUN 27 – The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that parents can opt children out of LGBTQ-themed curriculum conflicting with religious beliefs, affirming free exercise rights in public education.
- On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled by a 6-to-3 margin in Mahmoud v. Taylor that public schools are required to permit parents to exempt their children from instruction involving LGBTQ-themed storybooks if such content conflicts with the parents' religious convictions.
- This case arose after Montgomery County Public Schools rescinded an opt-out policy for a 2022-23 LGBTQ-inclusive curriculum due to unworkable administrative burdens from many parental requests.
- The Court found that denying parental opt-outs violated their First Amendment free exercise rights and highlighted ongoing challenges in balancing educational content with religious freedoms nationwide.
- Justice Thomas concurred on the decision's broad impact on schools, while Justice Sotomayor dissented, warning that advance notice and opt-outs impose impossible burdens on public education.
- The ruling may prompt more parental opt-out requests and school adjustments, suggesting future legal and administrative debates over curricular content and parental rights will likely continue.
15 Articles
15 Articles
The Conversation
In LGBTQ+ storybook case, Supreme Court handed a win to parental rights, raising tough questions for educators
The parents who brought the case had requested that their children be excused when books with LGBTQ+ characters were used in class. SDI Productions/E+ via Getty ImagesThe Supreme Court tends to save its blockbuster orders for the last day of the term – and 2025 was no exception. Among the important decisions handed down June 27, 2025, was Mahmoud v. Taylor – a case of particular interest to me, because I teach education law. Mahmoud, I believe, …
Final Supreme Court Decisions Before Summer Recess - Asian Journal News
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court concluded its 2024–2025 term on Friday, June 27, issuing rulings on five major cases before entering its annual summer recess. While its decision to limit nationwide injunctions in immigration lawsuits drew the most attention Supreme Court limits broad rulings against Trump policies, sidesteps birthright citizenship issue the justices also weighed in on several other significant matters involving parenta…
Arizona’s Education Leaders Applaud Supreme Court Ruling in Favor of Parental Rights and Sexually Explicit Curriculum
Arizona Superintendents of Public Instruction, past and present, along with conservative parental rights advocates are applauding the U.S. Supreme Court decision that allows parents to take their children out of class if the material being taught goes against their religious beliefs. Specifically, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on the case of Mahmoud v. Taylor...
Supreme Court delivers major wins on activist judges, parental rights, and porn regulation
In three separate 6-3 decisions on June 27, the Supreme Court delivered rulings that advanced key conservative priorities by reining in judicial overreach, strengthening parental rights… The post Supreme Court delivers major wins on activist judges, parental rights, and porn regulation appeared first on CatholicVote org.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
