Published 2 days ago • loading... • Updated 11 hours ago
Judge rules officers have no standing to sue over Capitol Jan. 6 plaque
The court found the officers lacked standing and left unresolved whether the plaque at the Capitol meets Congress’s 2022 directive.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich dismissed a lawsuit brought by former Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn and Metropolitan Police Department officer Daniel Hodges, ruling they lacked Article III standing to challenge the memorial's installation.
The officers filed suit in June 2025 after the Architect of the Capitol missed the March 2023 deadline set by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, which directed the agency to obtain and install a commemorative plaque for Jan. 6 responders.
Workers installed the memorial quietly at about 4 a.m. in a non-public Senate wing, utilizing a QR code instead of engraving individual names—an arrangement Dunn and Hodges argued was "hidden" and "exacerbated" their psychic injuries from the attack.
Friedrich ruled that deep personal interest does not satisfy constitutional requirements for federal court jurisdiction, finding the officers failed to show a court order was "likely" to alleviate their harms from the memorial's design.
The attack generated one of the largest federal criminal investigations in U.S. history, with more than 1,500 people charged before President Donald Trump issued pardons in January 2025, leaving the statutory compliance question unresolved.