US EditionIFPI and Others Criticize EU's AI Act Implementation Measures
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.9 Articles
9 Articles
Representatives of European and global authors, performers, publishers, producers and other rights holders' organisations have expressed their disagreement with the EU's Code of Conduct on Artificial Intelligence, calling it a missed opportunity to ensure adequate intellectual property protection in the context of generative AI and a failure to deliver on the promises of the act.
Implementation of EU AI Act “solely benefits” AI companies say creator groups who demand a complete rethink
The European Commission “largely ignored” creators and copyright owners when producing official guidance on the copyright and transparency obligations contained in the EU AI Act. Officials instead chose to implement the new AI regulations in a way that “solely benefits” the AI companies that “continuously infringe copyright and related rights to build their models”. That is according to a consortium of organisations representing creators and rig…
Creative Sector Responds to EU AI Act Implementation Measures
Representing a broad coalition of European and global authors, performers, publishers, producers and other rightsholder organisations, we wish to formally express our dissatisfaction with the published GPAI Code of Practice, […] The post Creative Sector Responds to EU AI Act Implementation Measures appeared first on IMRO.
40 organisations and actors from the cultural and creative industries criticise the EU implementation package on generative AI. In their statement, they accuse the European Commission of ignoring the central concerns of rightholders.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
