IRS says churches can endorse political candidates to congregations
- Earlier this week, both the plaintiffs and the IRS jointly asserted that the Johnson Amendment should not prevent churches from sharing religious messages with their members.
- This statement followed a lawsuit filed last August by the National Religious Broadcasters Association and others seeking to end enforcement of the 1954 Johnson Amendment.
- The IRS explained it has rarely enforced the amendment against churches for political speech, while President Trump signed a 2017 executive order directing Treasury to disregard it.
- Republican lawmakers introduced legislation earlier this year that aims to repeal the Johnson Amendment, which bans tax-exempt groups from endorsing political candidates.
- This development suggests a potential carve-out for religious organizations to endorse candidates without risking tax-exempt status, impacting political speech rules for houses of worship.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
27 Articles
27 Articles
All
Left
11
Center
9
Right
3
'Time to recruit some churches': Experts blast new rules on pulpit politics
The Internal Revenue Service promulgated a set of new rules on Monday that allow churches to endorse and donate to political candidates, The New York Times reported on Monday. The new rules were created at a time when religion had slowly become a staple in American politics. President Donald Trump h...
·United States
Read Full ArticlePastors Who Endorse Political Candidates Shouldn't Lose Tax-Exempt Status, IRS Says in Filing
The IRS says pastors who endorse political candidates from the pulpit should not have to risk losing their tax-exempt status. The move effectively calls for a carve-out for religious organizations from the rarely used IRS rule called the Johnson Amendment, put in place in 1954 and named after then-Sen. Lyndon Johnson.
·Saudi Arabia
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources27
Leaning Left11Leaning Right3Center9Last UpdatedBias Distribution48% Left
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources lean Left
48% Left
L 48%
C 39%
13%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium