Harvard is hoping court rules Trump administration’s $2.6B research cuts were illegal
UNITED STATES, JUL 21 – A federal judge challenged the Trump administration's rationale for cutting $2.6 billion in research funding to Harvard, raising constitutional concerns over academic freedom.
- On Monday, Harvard University challenged a $2.6 billion research funding cut in Boston’s federal court, highlighting a pivotal legal moment.
- An April 11 letter prompted Harvard to allege retaliation, as the federal antisemitism task force demanded policy changes, leading to funding cuts from the Trump administration.
- Harvard is drawing on its $53 billion endowment to sustain research, as the freeze affects over 900 projects including cancer, Alzheimer’s, and public health studies.
- Burroughs questioned the lack of documentation behind 'ad-hoc' funding cancellations, noting the absence of evidence; she declined to rule but appeared open to Harvard’s arguments.
- Such a decision would revive scientific and medical research operations and hundreds of halted projects, Harvard University officials say, if they win the court case.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
114 Articles
114 Articles
It's a new episode in the arm that pits Donald Trump from universities, including Harvard. On Monday, July 21, the two sides clashed in court. Harvard accuses the administration of violation of academic freedom, after the freezing of billions of dollars of funds essential to research.
·Paris, France
Read Full ArticleHarvard takes Donald Trump to court in attempt to restore billions in federal funding
Harvard University yesterday urged a federal judge to order US president Donald Trump’s administration to restore about $2.5bn (€2.14bn) in cancelled federal grants and cease efforts to cut off research funding to the prestigious Ivy League school.
·Ireland
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources114
Leaning Left24Leaning Right15Center35Last UpdatedBias Distribution47% Center
Bias Distribution
- 47% of the sources are Center
47% Center
L 32%
C 47%
R 20%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium