I defend Ezra Shabot’s right to publish what he published. Without asterisks. I don’t share a line from his column in Nexos, but I don’t want to see him censored, canceled or disappeared from the conversation. On the contrary. Precisely because I defend that right I take his text seriously and I answer it. Censorship would have freed him from this. The debate, no. And the debate starts where he preferred to go. One. The word isn’t his Shabot wri…