Judgment: Afd Fails with Lawsuit Against Hamburg's Interior Senator Grote
7 Articles
7 Articles
In parliament, Hamburg's SPD internal senator Grote accused the AfD of relativizing National Socialism and Holocaust as part of their "basic narrative." The Federal Constitutional Court rejects the right-wing party's lawsuit – a remarkable interpretation of the neutrality rule for government members.
Here you can find information on the topic "Judgment". Read now "AfD fails with lawsuit against Hamburg's interior senator Grote.
For Hamburg's interior senator Andy Grote, the relativization of the Holocaust belongs to the basic narrative of the AfD. She considers this to be inadmissible and has thus moved to the Constitutional Court – without success.
Did Hamburg-based Senator Andy Grote say that "the relativization of National Socialism" belongs to the "baseline narrative" of the AfD? The party found no, complained against it – and failed.
The AfD failed before the Hamburg Constitutional Court with a lawsuit against interior senator Andy Grote (SPD). The court largely dismissed the applications filed by the AfD-Landesverband, citizenship group and several members of the party as inadmissible.
The Hamburg Constitutional Court has dismissed the AfD's lawsuit against Interior Senator Andy Grote (SPD) and the Senate. The court announced on Friday that the applications filed by the state association, the AfD parliamentary group, and seven members of parliament, some of whom were former, were partly inadmissible and partly unfounded. The reason for the dispute over organs was a speech made by the senator at the Hamburg Parliament session o…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium