Google Remedies Signal the Beginning of ‘America First’ Antitrust
6 Articles
6 Articles
Google remedies signal the beginning of ‘America First’ antitrust
The results are in: Google has an illegal search monopoly, and now it’s going to pay the price. Judge Amit Mehta’s ruling in the Justice Department’s antitrust lawsuit against Google was a victory for the Trump administration, and specifically the antitrust division under Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater. When the Justice Department filed its antitrust... The post Google remedies signal the beginning of ‘America First’ antitrust appeared f…
A Judge Just Decided to Let Google Keep Breaking the Law
After nearly five years of intense litigation, the landmark United States v. Google antitrust trial is finally over. Judge Amit P. Mehta ruled last fall that Google illegally monopolized internet search for more than a decade by paying smartphone makers, wireless carriers, and web browsers to be the default—and sometimes exclusive—search engine for users. The case then moved on to the remedies stage, where Justice Department attorneys asked for …
DuckDuckGo CEO criticizes Google antitrust remedies as insufficient
Gabriel Weinberg condemns court-ordered measures as inadequate to address search monopoly, claims Google will continue blocking competitors including AI search platforms. Continue reading this article on ppc.land. Sign up the PPC Land newsletter to get the latest marketing news.
Google won’t have to sell Chrome or Android in Antitrust ruling
Alphabet’s stock saw a sharp jump of nearly nine percent after a U.S. federal judge handed down a ruling that significantly eased fears about how far the remedies in Google’s high-profile antitrust case would go. The Department of Justice had been pushing for aggressive structural changes, including the possibility of forcing Google to sell off its Chrome browser or even divest parts of its Android operating system. Those demands, if accepted, c…
A U.S. federal court has ruled in one of the largest antitrust cases in decades. Judge Amit Mehta confirmed that Google had an illegal monopoly on search, but he also rejected the harshest penalties the Justice Department had sought. One of the main risks was that the court would force Google to sell its Chrome browser or Android operating system, Google's most valuable assets. Such a move would deprive the company of significant network effects…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium