See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Gaza truce talks faltering over withdrawal, Palestinian and Israeli sources say

GAZA STRIP, PALESTINE, JUL 12 – Negotiations stalled as Israel proposes maintaining military presence in over 40% of Gaza, while Hamas demands full troop withdrawal, blocking a 60-day ceasefire and hostage release deal.

  • Talks for a ceasefire in Gaza are faltering due to disagreements over Israeli troop withdrawal, according to Palestinian and Israeli sources in Doha.
  • Hamas has rejected Israel's proposed withdrawal plans, which would leave 40% of Gaza under Israeli control, according to a Palestinian source.
  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized that neutralizing Hamas as a security threat is essential for any long-term ceasefire discussions.
  • The conflict began on October 7, 2023, resulting in over 57,000 Palestinian deaths and significant humanitarian crises, as reported by Gaza health authorities.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

51 Articles

All
Left
12
Center
19
Right
14
ReutersReuters
+6 Reposted by 6 other sources
Center

Gaza truce talks faltering over withdrawal, Palestinian and Israeli sources say

The Doha talks are stalling over determining the extent of the Israeli military's withdrawal from Gaza, Palestinian and Israeli sources said.

·United Kingdom
Read Full Article
Lean Left

The indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas on a ceasefire in Gaza are stumbling down on the issue of the withdrawal of the Israeli army.

·Montreal, Canada
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 42% of the sources are Center
42% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Anadolu Ajansı broke the news in Ankara, Türkiye on Friday, July 11, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.