Plagiarism Before the Election of a Judge - Expert Opinion Relieves Brosius-Gersdorf
9 Articles
9 Articles
The dispute over the election of Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf as constitutional judge continues. A short report relieves her of the accusation of scientific misconduct. The SPD remains behind her, the CDU remains skeptical.
In the Union, the SPD judge candidate Brosius-Gersdorf is also controversial about her doctoral thesis because of the plagiarism submissions. An expert report, which the lawyer himself commissioned, now relieves her of the burden.
"Ultralinks" was the name of the SPD judge candidate of Union members. Furthermore, there were plagiarism accusations because of her doctoral thesis. Experts contradict.
The SPD candidate for the Federal Constitutional Court, Brosius-Gersdorf, is not to be accused of scientific misconduct after a short report she herself commissioned.
The SPD constitutional judge Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf has commissioned a short report. According to this report, no scientific misconduct is to be accused of. However, the evaluation is only provisional.
In the Union, SPD candidate Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf is controversial because of certain positions. Most recently, accusations about her doctoral thesis were added.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 57% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium