Federal judge refuses to block Trump order to create federal voter list and limit mail voting
The judge said the challenge was premature because the order has not yet been implemented and no flawed voter lists have been produced.
- On May 28, District Judge Carl Nichols declined to block President Donald Trump's Executive Order tightening mail-in voting rules, marking a loss for The Democrats who argued the measure could disenfranchise millions of voters.
- The Executive Order, signed March 31, mandates the Postal Service deliver ballots only to voters on approved lists and requires states to preserve election records for five years while directing agencies to build "state citizenship lists."
- Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Plaintiffs argued the Order infringes on states' rights under the Constitution, claiming Department and Social Security Administration data used for "state citizenship lists" risks excluding lawfully registered voters due to outdated information.
- Dismissing the request, Nichols wrote: "Given that the Executive Order does not command Plaintiffs to do anything, and that no agency has yet acted pursuant to the Order in a way that could harm Plaintiffs, they have not suffered any harm at present."
- A separate lawsuit challenging the Order proceeds in Boston, where District Judge Indira Talwani is scheduled to hear arguments on June 2, as Republicans and The Democrats remain locked in a tight battle for control of Congress.
213 Articles
213 Articles
Roundup: Voting by mail / Anthropic / Iran war
Judge sides with Trump: A federal judge on Thursday declined to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting voting by mail, ruling challenges to the directive were premature. The decision by U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, marks a setback for Democratic groups, lawmakers and the NAACP, which are seeking to halt the order before November’s midterm elections. The March 31 order directs the U.S. Postal Service to…
JUST IN: Federal Judge Delivers Massive Win For Trump On Election Integrity
A federal judge’s recent ruling represents a crucial victory for election integrity in the United States. U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols dismissed several lawsuits from the Democratic National Committee and other activist groups that sought to block President Donald Trump’s executive order on mail-in voting and citizenship verification. Judge Nichols, appointed by Trump, delivered a clear message: the lawsuits lacked merit and the plaintiffs d…
HUGE WIN FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY: Federal Judge SMASHES Desperate Democrat Lawsuit from DNC, Schumer, and Jeffries — Clears Way for Citizenship Checks on Mail-In Ballots * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hᴏft
A federal judge on Thursday handed President Donald Trump and election integrity advocates a major victory after rejecting Democrats’ desperate attempt to block Trump’s executive order aimed at tightening mail-in voting rules and strengthening citizenship verification for federal elections.
DSR Daily May 28: Judge Paves Way for Trump’s Mail-in Voting Crackdown - The DSR Network
On the DSR Daily for Thursday, we cover a judge paving the way for Trump’s mail-in voting executive order, a Justice Department probe targeting E. Jean Carroll, Jill Biden’s insane admission, and more.
Judge refuses to block Trump order to limit mail voting. There’s no immediate effect on the midterms.
A federal judge has declined to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order creating a federal voter list and limiting mail voting, clearing the way for potential sweeping changes in how American elections are run shortly before this year’s midterm elections.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium



































