See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Election of Judges: Brosius-Gersdorf Defends Itself Against Allegations – "Reality Remotes" and "Diffaming"

On Friday, two constitutional judges were elected to the Bundestag.The election of two constitutional judges flew off the agenda.

25 Articles

Lean Right

The election of legal professor Brosius-Gersdorf fails because of political power struggle. Threats and explosive posts cause a stir.

·Berlin, Germany
Read Full Article
Left

The candidate for the Constitutional Court attaches importance to the finding that she is not "ultraleft" or "left radical".

Read Full Article
Lean Right

The controversial candidate for the BVerfG, Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, denies all accusations in a public statement and gets help from colleagues. But the Constitutional Court is not a Faculty of Law. And the self-defense of Brosius-Gersdorf is far from convincing.

Read Full Article
Center

The SPD candidate for a post as a judge at the Federal Constitutional Court defends herself against allegations raised against her. Read here the statement of the lawyer in the text.

·Berlin, Germany
Read Full Article

Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf publishes a statement – and refuses to report on her. Some media would have wanted to prevent her from being elected constitutional judge.

·Frankfurt, Germany
Read Full Article
Center

After the failure of the constitutional judge's election, some 300 legal scientists have made massive criticisms of the public approach to the candidate Brosius-Gersdorf.

·Germany
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 42% of the sources are Center
42% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Berliner Morgenpost broke the news in Berlin, Germany on Tuesday, July 15, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.