Election of Judges: Brosius-Gersdorf Defends Itself Against Allegations – "Reality Remotes" and "Diffaming"
25 Articles
25 Articles
The election of legal professor Brosius-Gersdorf fails because of political power struggle. Threats and explosive posts cause a stir.
The candidate for the Constitutional Court attaches importance to the finding that she is not "ultraleft" or "left radical".
The controversial candidate for the BVerfG, Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, denies all accusations in a public statement and gets help from colleagues. But the Constitutional Court is not a Faculty of Law. And the self-defense of Brosius-Gersdorf is far from convincing.
The SPD candidate for a post as a judge at the Federal Constitutional Court defends herself against allegations raised against her. Read here the statement of the lawyer in the text.
Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf publishes a statement – and refuses to report on her. Some media would have wanted to prevent her from being elected constitutional judge.
After the failure of the constitutional judge's election, some 300 legal scientists have made massive criticisms of the public approach to the candidate Brosius-Gersdorf.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 42% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium