Cuts to the National Science Foundation endanger wealth of research
- Since January 2025, the National Science Foundation has undergone layoffs, leadership resignations, program cuts, and the abolition of its 37 divisions across the United States.
- These changes stem from a proposed 55% federal funding cut for fiscal year 2026 and political decisions tied to the current administration’s stance on certain ideologies.
- NSF funding has historically supported key discoveries and workforce development in fields like climate science, AI, quantum materials, and has benefited over 1,800 institutions nationwide including red and blue states.
- The Federal Reserve estimates that investments in NSF-supported nondefense research and development have generated returns ranging from one and a half to three times the original funding, while by early May 2025, over 1,400 NSF grants totaling more than one billion dollars had been discontinued.
- The cuts risk reducing the scientific workforce, harming local economies in diverse states, and pose challenges to maintaining U.S. Leadership in science, prompting calls for Congress to protect NSF funding.
31 Articles
31 Articles
Dire consequences from federal disinvestment in academic research
Regarding Ted Diadiun’s May 11 column, “A plea for sanity in financing a college education”: I agree the current cost of a college education is outrageous. But I take issue with misleading readers about federally funded research performed at universities.The $60 billion Diadiun quoted is not a university handout. Instead, it’s a collective investment in our country, and by extension, all humans worldwide. I’m a professor at Case Western Reserve …
America Accelerates Technological Progress via Strategic Science Funding - Real News Now
The sluggish pace of grant allocations by the National Science Foundation, a major contributor to the foundation level scientific research at American institutions, is something we have not seen for at least 35 years. This is a noteworthy shift given the NSF’s historical role in supporting the initiation of research that would eventually pave the way for technological innovations and help maintain U.S. superiority in areas such as computer scien…

‘Devastated’ and ‘Hopeless.’ Researchers Speak Out on Funding Cuts
In February, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) — the world’s largest public funder of biomedical research — began an ideological purge of its grants. Without warning, hundreds of research projects — many of which had been underway for years, representing thousands of hours of work and billions of dollars in investment — were abruptly cancelled without a scientifically valid explanation. The NIH cited only vague connections to “gender ident…
National Science Foundation funding cuts could threaten the economy, science, and safety
Look closely at your mobile phone or tablet. Touch-screen technology, speech recognition, digital sound recording and the internet were all developed using funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation. No matter where you live, NSF-supported research has also made your life safer. Engineering studies have reduced earthquake damage and fatalities through better building design. Improved hurricane and tornado forecasts reflect NSF investment …
NSF cuts endanger research that improves economic growth, national security and your life
A fired cancer researcher from the National Institutes of Health. (Photo courtesy of NIH.) Look closely at your mobile phone or tablet. Touch-screen technology, speech recognition, digital sound recording and the internet were all developed using funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation. No matter where you live, NSF-supported research has also made your life safer. Engineering studies have reduced earthquake damage and fatalities throu…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 61% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage