What Is the Controversial Definition of Antisemitism that Institutions Are Being Told to Adopt?
AUSTRALIA, JUL 15 – The government weighs adopting the IHRA definition amid concerns it may limit free speech and stifle criticism of Israel, with 39 universities already endorsing a related version.
- Australia's government is considering adopting an action plan based on the IHRA definition of antisemitism to guide responses to antisemitic incidents.
- The plan relies on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition, which Kenneth Stern, its drafter, has criticised as conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism.
- Supporters argue the definition helps tackle antisemitism by protecting Jews, while critics warn it may suppress free speech and legitimate debate on Israel and Palestine.
- The definition includes examples such as denying Jewish self-determination and comparing Israeli policy to Nazis, and universities may face funding cuts if they fail to address antisemitism.
- The plan's adoption has heightened debates about free speech and antisemitism, with calls for comprehensive training and stronger legislation to prevent hateful conduct.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
15 Articles
15 Articles
4
2
4
Defining ‘Antisemitism’ Is the Subject of Bitter Debate
Many donors, politicians and Jewish students have pressured their colleges to confront antisemitism more forcefully. But one challenge can make the exercise feel like quicksilver. There’s no consensus about what, precisely, constitutes antisemitism. University administrators and federal officials alike have considered one contentious definition that has gained traction in recent years, put forward by the International Holocaust Remembrance Allia…

+3 Reposted by 3 other sources
What is the controversial definition of antisemitism that institutions are being told to adopt?
While the definition has largely been viewed as uncontroversial, subsequent “examples of antisemitism in public life” published alongside the definition have been criticised as limiting freedom of speech.
·Sydney, Australia
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources15
Leaning Left4Leaning Right4Center2Last UpdatedBias Distribution40% Left, 40% Right
Bias Distribution
- 40% of the sources lean Left, 40% of the sources lean Right
40% Right
L 40%
C 20%
R 40%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium