See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Spd Counters Merz Statements on the Election of Judges – and Attacks Spahn

The relationship between SPD and Union is still tense. SPD Group Managing Director Wiese does not accept first explanations from the CDU.

22 Articles

Center

Jens Spahn in the criticism: "Loss of confidence", according to the broken judge's election on the part of the SPD. This is now also reflected in a current survey.

Read Full Article
Lean Right

Only a minority of the population believe Union leader Jens Spahn to be trustworthy. According to a survey, 75 percent say the opposite. The CDU politician is also opposed by many Union voters.

Center

Everything "no broken leg" and certainly no crisis at all: Chancellor Merz does not see any time pressure after the broken judge's election, but the SPD is deeply outraged. In focus: Union leader Spahn.

·Hamburg, Germany
Read Full Article
Lean Left

The coalition speculated on a majority in the judge's election, which it could not obtain on its own. Who was Jens Spahn actually building on?

The alliance actually does not rule badly. Unfortunately, it is also quite good to spoil the mood for itself, as the example of the failed judge's election shows.

·Munich, Germany
Read Full Article
Center

After the failed election of new constitutional judges, Federal Chancellor Merz has backed Union leader Spahn. On ARD television, the CDU leader answered the question whether his party colleague Spahn was still the right man: "Of course, yes."

·Germany
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 44% of the sources are Center
44% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

berliner-sonntagsblatt.de broke the news in on Monday, July 14, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.