Skip to main content

We've updated our Privacy Policy. Questions? Email us any time at privacy@ground.news

Published loading...Updated

Turkey’s Constitutional Court Rejects Challenge Seeking Independent Civil Registry Records for Married Women - Stockholm Center for Freedom

Summary by stockholmcf.org
Turkey’s Constitutional Court has rejected a challenge on grounds of equality to a provision putting married women in their husbands’ family registries, a rule long criticized as gender discrimination, the Yeni Özgür Politika news website reported. The case was referred to the Constitutional Court by the İstanbul 14th Civil Court of First Instance, which sought the annulment of Article 23 of Turkey’s Population Services Law, arguing that it disc…

5 Articles

Lean Left

The Constitutional Court ruled that the provision in the Population Services Law stating that "The registration of a married woman is transferred to her husband's household" is not unconstitutional. Dissenting members stated that the regulation constitutes gender-based discrimination between spouses.

·Istanbul, Türkiye
Read Full Article

The Constitutional Court (AYM) ruled that the provision in the Population Services Law stating "The registration of a married woman is transferred to her husband's household" is not unconstitutional. Five members voted against the decision.

·Ankara, Türkiye
Read Full Article

Breaking news: The Constitutional Court (AYM) has ruled on the appeal regarding the registration of married women in their husbands' registry. The court stated that transferring a woman's registration to her husband's registry does not directly or decisively affect her legal status or any tangible benefit, and therefore rejected the appeal.

·Beyoğlu, Türkiye
Read Full Article

The Constitutional Court ruled that the provision in the Population Services Law regarding the transfer of a married woman's registration to her husband's household is not unconstitutional. The court rejected the request for annulment by a majority vote, with 5 members casting dissenting votes. The dissenting opinions stated that the regulation constitutes gender-based discrimination and undermines the principle of equality between spouses.

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 100% of the sources lean Left
100% Left

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Haberler broke the news on Sunday, August 9, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal