Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Barrett pivotal at Supreme Court for Trump's agenda
- Ruth Marcus resigned from the Washington Post due to editorial censorship and published her critical column in The New Yorker instead.
- Marcus stated that Trump's legal strategy has been backfiring, demonstrably in the lower courts.
- The Supreme Court, with its six-Justice conservative majority, may show deference to Presidential power, according to Marcus.
- Marcus expressed skepticism about the Supreme Court overturning a recent immunity ruling that protects Trump, stating it would not retroactively affect his prosecutions.
8 Articles
8 Articles
Will the Supreme Court Yield to Donald Trump?
On The New Yorker Radio Hour: the contributor Ruth Marcus looks at federal judges’ resistance to executive orders—and whether the Supreme Court will ultimately allow the President to remake the government in his image.
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Barrett pivotal at Supreme Court for Trump's agenda
Two of the Supreme Court's Republican appointees have become pivotal for President Trump's agenda, which lower court judges have hamstrung by issuing nationwide injunctions against his policies.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage