US EditionAderholt leads amicus brief against “forced ideological instruction”
- The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a lawsuit involving parents against Montgomery County Public Schools regarding an LGBTQ curriculum, where parents claim they were denied the option to opt out of certain teachings.
- The Legal Insurrection Foundation filed an amicus brief supporting parental rights, arguing that current policies violate religious freedom.
- The briefs submitted highlight concerns that the school curriculum forces beliefs on families, impacting their religious upbringing.
16 Articles
16 Articles
See the LGBTQ 'storybooks' young kids are forced to read, with no notice or opt-out, in SCOTUS case
Maryland's Montgomery County Public Schools does not notify parents when kids as young as 3 are exposed to "Pride Puppy," "Intersection Allies" and other sexually themed books in the English Language Arts curriculum.
Sons of Liberty Media
The Washington StandardShould Parents Have the Right to Opt Their Young Children Out of School Curriculum Promoting Alternative Ideas About Sexuality and Gender?
WASHINGTON, DC — Should parents have the right to opt their elementary-aged children out of mandatory public school curriculum that promotes alternative ideas about gender and sexuality? In a joint amicus brief in Mahmoud v. Taylor, The Rutherford Institute and the NC Values Institute have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm the right of parents from …
Parents Ask SCOTUS to Shield K-5 Children from LGBT Curriculum in MD
In 2022, the Montgomery County Board of Education announced new "inclusivity" books for K-5 students and took away parental notice and opt-outs for story books that discuss topics like "gender" transitions, pride parades, and preferred pronouns.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 89% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
