Mohammed Shami to Pay ₹4 Lakh per Month to Estranged Wife Hasin Jahan, Orders Calcutta HC
- On July 1, 2025, the Calcutta High Court ruled that Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami must provide a total of Rs 4 lakh every month as maintenance to his separated wife, Hasin Jahan, and their daughter.
- This ruling followed Hasin Jahan’s challenge to a 2023 district sessions court order that mandated Shami pay Rs 50,000 to her and Rs 80,000 to their daughter amid a troubled marriage since 2018.
- Hasin Jahan has made multiple serious accusations against Shami, including allegations of physical abuse, demands for dowry, involvement in corrupt practices related to match-fixing, and neglecting their daughter; Shami has denied these claims, and the BCCI eventually exonerated him from the match-fixing accusations.
- Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee explained that Rs 1.5 lakh for Hasin and Rs 2.5 lakh for their daughter fairly ensure financial stability based on Shami’s income amid ongoing legal proceedings.
- The court’s directive implies Shami must continue payments until the main case resolves, with liberty to assist their daughter additionally for education and other expenses.
16 Articles
16 Articles
Mohammed Shami suffers huge setback, HC orders him to pay Rs 4 lakh monthly alimony to ex-wife, daughter
Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami suffered a huge legal setback on Tuesday (July 1) as Calcutta High Court directed him to pay Rs 4 lakh alimony monthly to his estranged wife Hasin Jahan and daughter. Jahan had moved to High Court, challenging the district sessions court's order directing the pace bowler to pay Rs 50,000 to his wife and Rs 80,000 to her daughter in 2023. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee passed the order on Tuesday asking Shami to pay …


Cal HC orders Md Shami monthly payment of Rs 4 lakh as maintenance to estranged wife, daughter
Kolkata, Jul 1 (PTI) Calcutta High Court on Tuesday directed Indian pacer Mohammed Shami to pay his estranged wife, Hasin Jahan, and daughter a monthly alimony of Rs 4 lakh as maintenance during the ongoing legal battle with his spouse. Jahan had moved the high court against a district sessions court’s order directing the cricketer […]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium