Cabinet Office blames 'administrative error' over mistaken release of historical Andrew documents
The Cabinet Office attributed the mistaken release of Prince Andrew's travel files to an administrative error amid ongoing scrutiny over his Epstein links, with critics calling for full transparency.
- During the annual 20-year transfer, the Cabinet Office admitted an "administrative error" after a No 10 file from 2004–05 on royal visits referring to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was briefly available to journalists before withdrawal.
- An embargoed version supplied to journalists included minutes about royal overseas travel that were later redacted before public release, after expert stakeholders reviewed files under the 20-year rule.
- The withdrawn minutes show Andrew's travel as a trade envoy, nicknamed 'Airmiles Andy,' including visits to China, Russia, southeast Asia and Spain, and an extra 90,000 for UK Trade and Industry.
- Campaigners and MPs urged clarity after the files briefly surfaced, with Graham Smith of Republic demanding release without fear and Labour MP Rachael Maskell calling on the government to explain the withholding.
- Archival releases include unexpected details from redevelopment plans to diplomatic sensitivities, revealing Project George’s subterranean 200-seat conference room and withheld memo of Tony Blair and Jacques Chirac on Diana’s death.
23 Articles
23 Articles
The Cabinet Office holds back files on the journeys of the former Duke of York when he was the country's Special Representative for Trade.
UK government admits error after release of royal documents on former Prince Andrew
Files discussing overseas travel by Elizabeth’s 2nd son were briefly shared with journalists before being withdrawn and redacted ahead of public release to the National Archives - Anadolu Ajansı
The British government is accused of taking action to protect the family's gift, after it has recently blocked the publication of sensitive documents for the National Archives, including minutes that referred to the transfer costs of...
The government cabinet explained the withdrawal as an administrative error, as the material should never have been published.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 47% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
















