The District Court dismissed a lawsuit by a person who claimed ownership of a historic building in Safed that is registered as state property. The judge ruled that the claim was frivolous and baseless, rejected claims of long-term possession, and imposed heavy costs on the plaintiff (Law and Justice)
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.
The District Court dismissed a lawsuit by a person who claimed ownership of a historic building in Safed that is registered as state property. The judge ruled that the claim was frivolous and baseless, rejected claims of long-term possession, and imposed heavy costs on the plaintiff (Law and Justice)