US EditionBangladesh rebukes US spy chief over religious violence remarks
- US National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard criticized Bangladesh for the persecution of religious minorities, stating that they face 'unfortunate persecution, killing, and abuse,' which concerns the US government and President Trump.
- Bangladesh's interim government, led by Professor Muhammad Yunus, rebuffed Gabbard's allegations, claiming that her remarks were 'not based on any evidence or specific allegations' and unfairly paint the nation negatively.
- The Chief Adviser’s office condemned Gabbard's comments, linking Bangladesh to the ideology of an 'Islamic Caliphate,' stating that they are 'misleading and damaging' to the country's image.
- Bangladesh emphasized that it has worked in partnership with the international community to tackle extremism and expressed its commitment to counterterrorism efforts.
55 Articles
55 Articles
Bangladesh's Reign of Terror: Toward the Next Islamist Hub of South Asia?
"Politics steadily worsens in Bangladesh. The economy is in free fall, law and order is in a cul-de-sac. The rule of law is under organised assault, with detained politicians, cultural activists and journalists unable to come by bail in court....
‘We Condemn Instances of Violence’: US Amid Row Over Tulsi Gabbard’s Remarks Against Bangladesh
Dhaka: After a controversy erupted over US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s remarks on the religious persecution of minorities in Bangladesh , the White House stated that it welcomes the measures taken by the South Asian nation’s interim government to ensure saf
French embassy in Dhaka stirs up a storm with X post on minority persecution, another by deleting it
It all began when the embassy shared Yunus govt’s response to US DNI Tulsi Gabbard's remark expressing concern over Bangladesh’s alleged persecution of religious minorities.
Is Bangladesh the next Afghanistan? - Washington Examiner
The smoke had hardly cleared from the Pentagon and ruins of the World Trade Center after the September 11, 2001 attacks before Democrats and Republicans began finger pointing: Was George W. Bush to blame for missing the warning signs about Al Qaeda’s plot? Wasn’t Bill Clinton to blame for allowing the safe haven to develop in the first place? The truth is both dropped the ball. Clinton was more poll-driven than his predecessors. Afghanistan was …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 54% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
