Skip to main content
Holiday Sale — Get 40% off Vantage for yourself or as a gift
Published loading...Updated

Attorney's office in favor of Netanyahu's defense? Condemned when the latter claimed to have been assaulted - and forgot about the threats to the plaintiff

Summary by וואלה!
A heated debate broke out in the internal WhatsApp group of the National Council of Attorneys, over the question of whether protesters who protested against the IDF's defense lawyer, Adv. Haddad, on entering the Supreme Court should be condemned. This was when the bureau eventually condemned the alleged assault. The prosecutor will demand: “4 years are attacking us, this is victimization”
DisclaimerThis story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.Cross Cancel Icon

1 Articles

A heated debate broke out in the internal WhatsApp group of the National Council of Attorneys, over the question of whether protesters who protested against the IDF's defense lawyer, Adv. Haddad, on entering the Supreme Court should be condemned. This was when the bureau eventually condemned the alleged assault. The prosecutor will demand: “4 years are attacking us, this is victimization”

Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

וואלה! broke the news in on Wednesday, March 26, 2025.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)
News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal