US EditionAntitrust – Fees – Prevailing party status
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.2 Articles
2 Articles
Antitrust – Fees – Prevailing party status – Rhode Island Lawyers Weekly
Where (1) plaintiffs filed a Clayton Act complaint to enjoin a proposed merger between two airlines, (2) the Department of Justice, six states and the District of Columbia later filed their own lawsuit challenging the merger, (3) the DOJ case went to trial first, (4) the trial judge found that the proposed merger violated the Clayton Act and permanently enjoined the action and (5) after the plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed as moot, they sough…
Antitrust – Fees – Prevailing party status
Where (1) plaintiffs filed a Clayton Act complaint to enjoin a proposed merger between two airlines, (2) the Department of Justice, six states and the District of Columbia later filed their own lawsuit challenging the merger, (3) the DOJ case went to trial first, (4) the trial judge found that the proposed merger violated the Clayton Act and permanently enjoined the action and (5) after the plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed as moot, they sough…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
