US EditionAnthropic wins early round in music publishers' AI copyright case
- U.S. District Judge Eumi Lee ruled that the publishers' request was too broad and lacked evidence of irreparable harm caused by Anthropic's actions.
- The court declined to grant the publishers a preliminary injunction, stating that legal rights had not yet been established.
- Judge Eumi K. Lee noted that it was an 'open question' whether using copyrighted materials for AI training is illegal.
- Anthropic claimed that excluding an 'undefined amount of unknown material' from its training corpus would be 'virtually impossible.
37 Articles
37 Articles
Judge allows 'New York Times' copyright case against OpenAI to go forward
A federal judge on Wednesday rejected OpenAI’s request to toss out a copyright lawsuit from The New York Times that alleges that the tech company exploited the newspaper’s content without permission or payment.In an order allowing the lawsuit to go forward, Judge Sidney Stein, of the Southern District of New York, narrowed the scope of the lawsuit but allowed the case’s main copyright infringement claims to go forward.Stein did not immediately r…
Anthropic wins early round in music publishers' AI copyright case
Artificial intelligence company Anthropic convinced a California federal judge on Tuesday to reject a preliminary bid to block it from using lyrics owned by Universal Music Group and other music publishers to train its AI-powered chatbot Claude.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
