US EditionAngios vs Joana Marques. on a Third Day with Invoices and Accounts in Court, Ricardo Araujo Pereira and Fernando Alvim Defended the Humor
10 Articles
10 Articles
The request for compensation by the Angels after a humorous video by Joana Marques leads to reflection on the limits of humour and freedom of expression. Nelson Nunes, author of the book "With humour it doesn't work," recalls that one who does plays "cannot predict the reactions", but that the goal is always to make laugh. In addition, he considers that "to establish a parallel between financial loss and a play is not something that can be done".
The third session of the trial that opposed the Rosado brothers to the humorist had a full house. Alvim defended that the video is "humour exercise", RAP that "consequences are uncontrollable".
Ricardo Araujo Pereira, one of the witnesses of the process that opposed the gang of Anjos to Joana Marques, considered this afternoon, that if the humorist is convicted, "serves any citizen" and that the fact of the double Sérgio and Nelson Rosado has felt guilty "can't serve to define whether or not things can be said." "I think if Joana is convicted, I also suffer. Firstly, everyone who has the same profession as Joana. Secondly, any citizen,…
"I don't escape the ridiculousness of being the official commentator on this subject, but I prefer this to be quiet." In the edition of the Night of the SIC News of this Wednesday, Ricardo Araujo Pereira tells Rodrigo Pratas the experience as a witness in the trial of Joana Marques, processed by a passage on the performance of Nelson and Sergio Rosado, twice known as Anjos, singing the son of Portugal.
Humorist believes that the artists are the "most wicked of what is read" with the v god that Joana published.
The accountant, a river company that represents a band company and the two humorists were heard. Joana Marques was heard on 11 July.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
