After editor's departure, Washington Post's publisher faces questions about phone hacking stories
- In mainstream American journalism, it's deemed unethical for a publisher to interfere in news decisions, especially if it relates to them.
- The New York Times reported Lewis informed Buzbee that a legal development involving Prince Harry didn't warrant coverage in the Post. The case involves phone hacking by Murdoch-owned newspapers. Plaintiffs claim Lewis attempted to suppress evidence, which he denies.
- Plaintiffs allege Lewis tried to suppress evidence in a legal case, including by destroying it.
21 Articles
21 Articles
After editor's departure, Washington Post's publisher faces questions about phone hacking stories
By DAVID BAUDER AP Media Writer NEW YORK (AP) — The Washington Post’s new CEO and publisher, Will Lewis, is facing questions about whether he made recent efforts to conceal his involvement in the aftermath of a British phone hacking scandal a decade ago. It has been a tumultuous week for Lewis, who was hired to turn around a venerable journalism brand that has fallen on hard times lately, losing viewers and money at an alarming pace. Lewis annou…

After editor's departure, Washington Post's publisher faces questions about phone hacking stories
The Washington Post's new CEO and publisher is facing questions about whether he made recent efforts to conceal his involvement in the aftermath of a British phone hacking scandal a
After editor's departure, Washington Post's publisher faces questions about phone hacking stories - The Morning Sun
The Washington Post's new CEO and publisher, Will Lewis, is facing questions about whether he made recent efforts to conceal his involvement in the aftermath of a British phone hacking scandal a …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 53% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium