After editor's departure, Washington Post's publisher faces questions about phone hacking stories
- In mainstream American journalism, it's deemed unethical for a publisher to interfere in news decisions, especially if it relates to them.
- The New York Times reported Lewis informed Buzbee that a legal development involving Prince Harry didn't warrant coverage in the Post. The case involves phone hacking by Murdoch-owned newspapers. Plaintiffs claim Lewis attempted to suppress evidence, which he denies.
- Plaintiffs allege Lewis tried to suppress evidence in a legal case, including by destroying it.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
21 Articles
21 Articles
All
Left
7
Center
9
Right
1
Coverage Details
Total News Sources21
Leaning Left7Leaning Right1Center9Last UpdatedBias Distribution53% Center
Bias Distribution
- 53% of the sources are Center
53% Center
L 41%
C 53%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage