The Particular Vote Against the Prosecution of the Attorney General: “It Is Not Possible to Attribute the Leak to Him in a Minimally Justified Manner”

abc

Lean Right

Factuality

Ownership

Andrés Palomo opposes putting García Ortiz on the bench and says that the revelation of secrets occurred before he knew the 'mail'

Eldiario.es

Lean Left

Factuality

Ownership

The dissenting magistrate Andrés Palomo is committed to filing the case against García Ortiz and criticizes the fact that the investigator has not believed the journalists who exculpated the Attorney General or that the UCO has avoided analyzing evidence of disclaimer that pointed to the dismissal from the beginningThe Supreme confirms that the Attorney General will be judged by the leaking of Ayuso's partner's mail The Supreme Court's decision …

El Pais

Lean Left

Factuality

Ownership

Andrés Palomo was the judge of the Appeals Chamber of the Supreme Court elected as rapporteur to draft the resolution that should respond to the appeals filed against the prosecution of Álvaro García Ortiz, Attorney General of the State, for the alleged leak of an email from the defense of Alberto González Amador, boyfriend of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, president of the Community of Madrid.

diario16plus.com

Factuality

Ownership

The decision to prosecute the Attorney General of the State has exposed the first major crack within the Appeals Chamber of the Supreme. Andrés Palomo’s particular vote is an argument in defense of legal logic and the presumption of innocence against the hard line imposed by Judge Angel Hurtado, whose investigation has ignored for months the indications exonerating Álvaro García Ortiz. What Palomo describes in his text is an instruction that has…

Actualidad.es

Factuality

Ownership

Judge Palomo’s decision to cast a dissenting vote in the García Ortiz case opens a debate on the criminal proceedings in Spain. Read more Analysis of the controversy in the Supreme Court’s particular vote in Actualidad.es.

El Independiente

Factuality

Ownership

No one remembers an equal precedent, a particular opinion of a Supreme Court judge at such an early procedural moment, that is, to confirm the indications that will lead to the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, on trial for a crime of disclosure of secrets. The rapporteur of this order, who came out yesterday, was Andrés Palomo who argued for closing the case by not seeing evidence against the head of the Public Prosecutor's Office, but his…