US Asked SpaceX to Turn Starlink On and Off in Several Countries, Sources Say
United States

Stringer/Reuters
What Happened
Key Implications
What Happened
Key Implications
Where Right Sources Focus
- Musk's Foreign Policy Influence: Conservative outlets highlight concerns about a private executive wielding outsized influence over national security decisions. They cite industry consultants and Congressional representatives who argue that unelected billionaires should not determine foreign policy, noting the ambiguity behind whether Musk's decisions stem from personal quirks or external pressures.
- White House Administration Responsibility: Right-leaning media emphasize the administration's direct role in directing Starshield usage and throttling service. They cite White House officials and statements from Elon Musk, noting that Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government, with limits ultimately decided by the military and the president.
Where Left Sources Focus
- Strategic Intelligence Coordination: Progressive and center outlets report extensively on government-SpaceX cooperation to thwart adversaries like the Houthis and Hezbollah. They cite former senior officials who describe how intelligence was shared with SpaceX to help the company identify and deactivate terminals diverted to militants.
- Humanitarian and Military Access: Coverage highlights the utility of Starlink for frontline defense in Ukraine and protest communication in Iran. Outlets feature reports from former officials on how administrations collaborated with SpaceX to bolster internet access for anti-government protesters and support Ukrainian military operations.
What's Largely Absent from Each Side
- Right sources rarely mention: Right sources rarely mention specific intelligence-sharing protocols between the US government and SpaceX regarding terminal usage by Houthi and Hezbollah militants. Left outlets feature this prominently, detailing how Pentagon and White House officials coordinated to identify and deactivate diverted hardware used by these groups.
- Left sources rarely mention: Left sources largely omit Musk’s public defense regarding Starshield’s chain of command, which right outlets feature prominently. These reports include Musk's assertion that Starshield systems are owned by the government and that any speed or usage limits are decided by the US military and the president.
Rare Agreement
- Strategic Dependency on Private Corporations: Sources across the ideological spectrum acknowledge the US government’s unprecedented reliance on private-sector companies like SpaceX to implement foreign policy. They agree that Starlink systems have become vital to military operations and that no viable short-term alternative exists for current satellite communications capabilities.
Timeline
October 23, 2026
Reuters reveals repeated US requests: On October 23, 2026 Reuters reported that both Biden and Trump administrations had multiple times asked SpaceX to turn Starlink on or off in various countries and that an internal White House order had throttled Ukraine's Starshield service this month, raising questions about government reliance on a private company for foreign‑policy implementation.
February 2026
Trump sought activation after Feb strikes: The Trump administration again discussed getting Starlink terminals into Iran and activated after US‑Israeli strikes in February 2026, according to former senior officials; neither the administration nor SpaceX publicly confirmed the activations.
June 2025
Trump sought activation after June strikes: Following US‑Israeli strikes in June 2025, the Trump administration discussed with Elon Musk and SpaceX making Starlink service available in Iran to support access and communications for anti‑government protesters, according to former officials.
Summary by Ground AI
Sources
See All 60A varied selection of sources chosen by Ground to reflect the diversity of this story’s coverage.
Most Written About
The stories getting the most coverage from the last 24 hours
Timeline
October 23, 2026
Reuters reveals repeated US requests: On October 23, 2026 Reuters reported that both Biden and Trump administrations had multiple times asked SpaceX to turn Starlink on or off in various countries and that an internal White House order had throttled Ukraine's Starshield service this month, raising questions about government reliance on a private company for foreign‑policy implementation.
February 2026
Trump sought activation after Feb strikes: The Trump administration again discussed getting Starlink terminals into Iran and activated after US‑Israeli strikes in February 2026, according to former senior officials; neither the administration nor SpaceX publicly confirmed the activations.
June 2025
Trump sought activation after June strikes: Following US‑Israeli strikes in June 2025, the Trump administration discussed with Elon Musk and SpaceX making Starlink service available in Iran to support access and communications for anti‑government protesters, according to former officials.













