Wrong, TIME, One Nor'easter Isn’t Proof of Climate Change - ClimateRealism
Read with caution - this story is only being covered by one news source that has a ‘low factuality’ rating, which means the outlet has a history of poor reporting practices. Learn more about factuality ratings here.2 Articles
2 Articles
Wrong, TIME, One Nor’easter Isn’t Proof of Climate Change
TIME starts with a storm, asks how climate change made it worse, and then assembles quotations supporting that premise while relegating contradictory evidence to a few sentences. That’s not how climate science is supposed to work. Nor is it how science journalism should work. The post Wrong, TIME, One Nor’easter Isn’t Proof of Climate Change appeared first on Watts Up With That?.
Wrong, TIME, One Nor'easter Isn’t Proof of Climate Change - ClimateRealism
In their article How Does Climate Change Impact Nor’easters? TIME magazine claims that a nor’easter which struck the northeastern United States in mid-September illustrates how climate change is making powerful storms more intense. That’s false. There is no evidence that the recent nor’easter was at all unusual or represents a long-term climate change induced shift […]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
