Woman testifies about alleged sexual assault by members of Canada’s 2018 world juniors team
- A woman identified as E.M. Testified in a London, Ontario court regarding her alleged sexual assault by five ex-players from Canada’s national junior hockey team in June 2018.
- The incident followed a night of drinking and dancing, after which E.M. Said she was in a hotel room where she felt forced to adopt a 'porn star persona' to cope with the men's demands.
- During cross-examination, defence lawyer Megan Savard challenged inconsistencies in E.M.'s statements and suggested her actions may have appeared consensual, while prosecutors allege the men obtained sexual acts without consent.
- E.M. Acknowledged memory gaps, including not recalling specific acts or identities except for McLeod and Formenton, and explained that she did not fully review a statement prepared by her lawyers for Hockey Canada in 2022.
- All five accused hockey players have pleaded not guilty, and the case highlights complexities around consent, memory, and the interpretation of E.M.'s behaviour during the alleged assault.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
26 Articles
26 Articles
All
Left
11
Center
3
Right
1

+18 Reposted by 18 other sources
Complainant in hockey players' sex assault trial says she adopted a 'persona' to cope
A woman who alleges she was sexually assaulted by five ex-world junior hockey players agreed Wednesday that she took on a "porn star persona" as a coping mechanism while in a hotel room with the men and that it may have appeared to them that she was
Woman testifies about alleged sexual assault by members of Canada's 2018 world juniors team
The woman who has accused five members of Canada’s 2018 world junior hockey team of sexual assault testified Monday that she was naked, drunk and scared when four of the men showed up unexpectedly in her hotel room seven years ago.
·Toronto, Canada
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources26
Leaning Left11Leaning Right1Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution73% Left
Bias Distribution
- 73% of the sources lean Left
73% Left
L 73%
C 20%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage