"Negative Effects": Why the Court of Auditors Criticizes Free Public Transport
9 Articles
9 Articles
The Court of Auditors is publishing a report on public transport this Monday, 15 September. Free public transport is expensive in large public transport networks, says the Cambon Street institution. However, it does not encourage motorists to make use of these less polluting mobilitys, according to these judges. - "negative effects": why the Court of Auditors criticizes free public transport (Transports).
In a report this Monday, the Court of Auditors criticizes the free public transport set up in several cities in France. About 40 cities have made this choice for their transport networks in France.
In a report published on Monday 15 September, the institution of Cambon Street alerts about the consequences of the decrease in the contribution of travellers to the operation of trams, buses and metros.
The magistrates of Cambon Street are convinced that the increase in the use of public transport in the major cities requires the strengthening of the offer. This requires an increase in the price of tickets.
A report by the Court of Auditors published this Monday highlights in particular the cost of free public transport in large public transport networks, a version contested by some elected representatives.
Free movement in large public transport networks is expensive without encouraging motorists to make use of these less polluting mobilitys, the Court of Auditors says in a report...
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium