Federal Judicial Manual Contains Climate-Advocacy Materials Biasing Judges, Coalition of AGs Says

Federal judicial manual contains climate-advocacy materials biasing judges, coalition of AGs says

A coalition of 27 Republican attorneys general is demanding that the Federal Judiciary Center remove material from an influential reference manual that's been cited by the Supreme Court.

EXCLUSIVE: 27 State AGs demand withdrawal of politically charged reference manual for federal judges

State Attorneys General Demand End to Climate Bias Aimed at Federal Judges

A coalition of 27 state attorneys general have delivered a sharp rebuke to the Federal Judicial Center (FJC) for allowing proponents of the climate litigation campaign to author a critical document that is used to guide federal judges on climate science, and called for the manual’s withdrawal. The FJC is a somewhat obscure federal entity that acts like a think tank for the judicial branch and is primarily funded by taxpayer dollars. The center r…

West Virginia leads fight against efforts by climate activists to "improperly" influence federal judges - West Virginia Daily News

CHARLESTON, W.Va. (WVDN) — West Virginia Attorney General JB McCuskey is leading a coalition of 27 attorneys general calling for the Federal Judicial Center to immediately withdraw what he calls an inappropriate new addition to the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence that deals with “climate science.”  For decades, the Manual has been an important research tool for judges and attorneys. The U.S. Supreme Court has cited it to explain basic pr…