Indian CEO, Chhattisgarh-Based Firm Sanctioned by US over Sudan Civil War
- On Friday, The United States imposed sanctions on eight individuals and entities linked to networks fueling Sudan's civil war, including Raipur-based SBL Energy Limited and its Chief Executive Officer Alok Choudhari.
- Fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces has displaced nearly 13 million people, prompting Washington to target entities enabling both sides to sustain the conflict.
- SBL Energy supplied over 200 shipments of explosives to Sudan-based Target Multiactivities Company, while a separate Panama-based Talent Bridge network allegedly recruited former Colombian military personnel to fight for the RSF.
- The United States urged warring parties to accept an "immediate, unconditional" three-month humanitarian truce, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, noting the administration remains committed to advancing peace.
- Ports Engineering Company in Port Sudan faced sanctions for importing military equipment from the United Arab Emirates and Turkey, aiming to disrupt supply chains sustaining the ongoing violence.
20 Articles
20 Articles
Indian firm, CEO among entities sanctioned by U.S. for ‘fuelling’ civil war in Sudan
The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control said the targeted networks enabled both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces to expand and intensify civil war
US sanctions eight individuals, entities including Indian national, Chhattisgarh firm over alleged Sudan conflict networks
The United States on Friday imposed sanctions on eight individuals and entities, including an Indian national and a Chhattisgarh-based explosives manufacturer, for their alleged links to procurement and recruitment networks that Washington said have fuelled Sudan's civil war.
Sudan civil war: US sanctions Indian firm, Raipur CEO among 8 entities, says ‘these networks supply explosives….’
The US has sanctioned eight individuals and entities, including Indian national Alok Choudhari, for their alleged role in supporting Sudan's civil war. These networks have reportedly supplied arms and explosives to prolong the conflict, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in the region.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium











