Published • loading... • Updated
UK court orders Samsung to pay China's ZTE a $392 million lump sum after patent trial
Judge Richard Meade said Samsung must pay $392 million after the companies failed to agree on renewal terms for a 2021 patent deal.
- On Friday, London's High Court ruled that Samsung Electronics must pay a $392 million lump sum to license ZTE's mobile-phone patents, concluding the English leg of their global licensing dispute.
- After failing to renew a 2021 patent license agreement, Samsung sued ZTE in London in December 2024 seeking a determination of fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms for the technology.
- Judge Richard Meade set the award above Samsung's maximum $200 million argument but below the $731 million ZTE had sought, positioning the ruling between both parties' financial demands.
- Both companies retain the right to appeal the ruling, while ZTE has brought parallel lawsuits against Samsung in China, Germany, and Brazil as the dispute extends globally.
- England remains a popular jurisdiction for patent litigation following a landmark 2020 Supreme Court ruling that enables courts to set global FRAND terms, positioning this award as a precedent for future licensing standards.
Insights by Ground AI
8 Articles
8 Articles
UK court orders Samsung to pay China's ZTE a $392 million lump sum after patent trial
Samsung Electronics must pay a $392 million lump sum for a licence to use ZTE's patents for mobile phones, London's High Court ruled on Friday in the English leg of the companies' global licensing dispute.
·United Kingdom
Read Full ArticleSamsung is Handing Over $392 Million to ZTE in Global Patent Clash: Here's Why
The UK High Court recently ordered Samsung to pay $392 million to ZTE to license standard-essential patents amid a legal dispute. These specific patents ensure smartphones can actually access mobile networks. So, they are a non-negotiable part of modern hardware. Samsung vs ZTE lawsuit for essential patents The conflict centers on FRAND terms—an industry acronym for “fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory” licensing. Samsung and ZTE had a prev…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources8
Leaning Left0Leaning Right1Center5Last UpdatedBias Distribution83% Center
Bias Distribution
- 83% of the sources are Center
83% Center
C 83%
R 17%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium






