Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf Describes the Prohibition of Surrogacy as "Fundamental Rights Intervention"
11 Articles
11 Articles
In ZDF, constitutional lawyer Brosius-Gersdorf refers to a clear position on the prohibition of surrogacy – and provides an argument that makes you listen.
Does the ban on surrogate motherhood contradict the Constitution? In any case, Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, who failed in the election to the Constitutional Judge, asserts this. What the lawyer claims to be fundamentally illegal is thus the Christian human image par excellence.
Kreiszeitung
merkur.deAfter the resignation of Jens Spahn, constitutional lawyer Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf spoke in the ZDF "Morning Magazine" on the debate about surrogacy in Germany. The legal professor chose clear words and described the existing ban as a fundamental right intervention.
Legal scientist Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf considers the surrogacy ban to be paternalistic and unconstitutional. She calls for a factual debate and emphasizes: "The rights of the child are very important.
The legal scientist Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf promotes the extensive legalization of surrogacy. The radical human image, which she subordinates to the Basic Law, reduces dignity to arbitrariness.
The legal scientist Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf does not consider the current ban on surrogacy compatible with the Basic Law. There is a right to self-determined action in Germany, she says.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 63% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
