The Court Gave the AFA a Hard Setback and Stopped the Unification of the Cases in the Court that the Defendants Wanted.
7 Articles
7 Articles
The highest court declared itself contrary to the fact that all the files fell to Federal Judge González Charvay; it also ruled against the IGJ not controlling the balance sheets of the entity.
The highest court ordered that the complaint continue in the National Investigative Justice.The federal judge of Campana, Adrián González Charvay, had claimed the file for its connection with Pilar's mansion attributed to the treasurer of the AFA. Also that the General Inspectorate of Justice continue to investigate the balances of the AFA.
The Supreme Court resolved a package of cases of strong political impact on the press between the national government and the Argentine Football Association, and on all fronts the result was adverse for the entity that presides Claudio “Chiqui” Tapia. The decisions came with the signature of the three judges of the court: Horacio [...]
The Supreme Court of Justice ordered that investigations into alleged financial irregularities in the Argentine Football Association (AFA) continue in the National Justice with seat in the City of Buenos Aires, in a decision that represents a hard setback for the president of the entity, Claudio “Chiqui” Tapia, and his treasurer, Pablo Toviggino. ... Read more
Judicial Review for AFA: Supreme Court Refuses to Unify Cases for Alleged Fraud and Money Laundering
The highest court rejected the request to concentrate investigations against AFA leaders in the Federal Court of Campana. The cases include complaints of alleged irregularities in the management of funds abroad, fraudulent administration and false balances. On Thursday the Supreme Court of Justice made a sharp setback to the claims [...]
Buenos Aires, 5 November (NA)—The Supreme Court of Justice annulled a ruling of the Civil Chamber that had favored the AFA and enabled its operation in the province of Buenos Aires. Judges Horacio Rosatti, Carlos Rosenkrantz and Ricardo Lorenzetti considered that the ruling of 18 June last was arbitrary and that the General Inspectorate of Justice (IGJ) maintains its powers of control over the association. The conflict originated at the assembly…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
